Secure research collaboration, ransomware investigation, pharmaceutical intelligence and device or supplier validation.
Healthcare and life sciences organisations run research, clinical trials and security operations alongside systems that hold patient data and support care, and cannot afford to have investigation, testing or research work introduce risk into those systems.
At the same time, research programmes, device development and vendor relationships all generate documentation obligations — for IRBs, FDA submissions or postmarket surveillance — while security teams need to investigate healthcare-specific threats such as ransomware without ever routing that work through clinical infrastructure.
Research and clinical trial teams work in isolated, high-performance environments that protect experimental designs and datasets from unauthorised access or exfiltration. Institutions, CROs and academic partners can collaborate inside the same boundary, with research activity documented to support IRB and regulatory review.
Security teams investigate healthcare-specific ransomware and insider-threat activity from an environment kept apart from clinical systems, so the investigation itself cannot become a further point of exposure. The same environments support training on healthcare-specific attack patterns and rehearsal of incident-response playbooks.
Competitive and scientific research into drug-development pipelines, clinical trials and patents runs from a workspace that does not reveal the organisation's interest, reaching regulatory databases and restricted literature anonymously. Findings on potential M&A or licensing opportunities are protected within documented, secure environments.
Applications, APIs and firmware associated with a medical device are evaluated without connecting to clinical systems or patient data, checking against FDA cybersecurity guidance and ISO 14971 expectations. Findings are documented to support premarket submissions or postmarket surveillance activity.
Software, vendors and digital tools used across the supply chain are tested for interoperability, security and compliance without connecting to real systems, surfacing third-party risk before procurement or integration. The resulting documentation supports risk assessments and vendor-management processes.
Teams evaluate how healthcare technology partners handle protected health information and test clinical-application integrations in isolated environments before granting access. Verification of FDA and HIPAA-related claims and generated documentation support regulatory audits and vendor certification decisions.
Proprietary methodologies, clinical research data and experimental findings are protected inside isolated environments designed to prevent leakage or IP theft.
Security testing, incident response and threat hunting for healthcare-specific attacks run without exposing clinical systems or patient data.
Detailed, verifiable records of research activity support FDA submissions, clinical trial documentation and regulatory inspections.
Distributed research teams and external partners get controlled access to shared work without exposing sensitive data or methodologies.
During a suspected ransomware incident, the security team needs to examine attacker infrastructure and malware samples closely enough to understand how the attack unfolded. Doing that analysis from a machine connected to the clinical network would risk extending the incident rather than containing it. Instead, analysts open a disposable workspace with no connection to clinical systems and examine the attacker's infrastructure and captured samples there. Findings and evidence are documented as the investigation proceeds, supporting both the immediate response and any later regulatory notification. Once evidence has been captured, the workspace is retired, leaving nothing from the investigation behind on operational infrastructure.
CyberLane helps healthcare and life sciences organisations identify where research, security-investigation and vendor-evaluation workflows currently risk touching clinical systems, and designs the isolated-workspace and documentation approach needed to separate them. We support the business case for adoption, plan a proof of concept against a research or incident-response scenario, and oversee implementation, while platform delivery itself is coordinated with Replica Cyber or a qualified implementation partner.
CyberLane is independent and works on the decision rather than the deployment. Product-specific delivery is coordinated with the vendor or a qualified implementation partner.
Capability descriptions are based on the vendor's published materials; CyberLane's wording is independently written.
We start with an independent conversation about where your exposure actually sits, before any technology decision is made.