Trigger step-up authentication on risky transactions based on value, destination or behavioural signals.
Not every transaction carries the same risk, yet many systems apply either uniform friction or none at all. Organisations need transaction-level checks that can distinguish a routine purchase from one that looks likely to be fraudulent, and respond with proportionate authentication rather than a blanket rule.
Trigger step-up verification for transactions above a threshold or sent to a new or high-risk destination.
Flag transactions that deviate from a customer's typical spending pattern or timing.
Require passkey or push approval at the moment of transaction, tied to the specific amount and payee.
Route unusual approved transactions to a fraud team queue for follow-up even after completion.
Configurable thresholds and risk conditions.
Confirmation tied to specific amount and payee.
Feeds spending pattern data into risk decisions.
Flags unusual transactions for follow-up.
A customer's account initiates a transfer well above their typical monthly spend, to a payee they have never sent funds to before. Authsignal's transaction rules recognise both signals and trigger a passkey confirmation showing the exact amount and payee before the transfer is released. The genuine customer, making a rare but legitimate large purchase, approves the transfer from their device without issue. Had the request instead come from an attacker who had gained partial account access, the missing passkey would have blocked the transfer outright, and the attempt would appear in the fraud team's review queue.
CyberLane helps payments and fraud teams define transaction risk thresholds and behavioural signals, then advises on configuring Authsignal's rules engine to apply step-up authentication proportionately.
CyberLane is independent and works on the decision rather than the deployment. Product-specific delivery is coordinated with the vendor or a qualified implementation partner.
Content is paraphrased independently by CyberLane from Authsignal's public use-case pages for evaluation purposes; it is not an Authsignal publication.
We start with an independent conversation about where your exposure actually sits, before any technology decision is made.