FaceTec's age-estimation technology confirms whether a user meets an age threshold without requiring full identity disclosure.
Many age-restricted services need to confirm a user is old enough to proceed, but requiring a full identity document for every such check is disproportionate and creates unnecessary privacy exposure, particularly where only a yes/no answer against an age threshold is actually needed.
FaceTec's age-estimation approach, drawn from the same 3D FaceScan technology used for identity verification, allows a service to check whether someone meets a defined age threshold without necessarily collecting or retaining full identifying document data.
Estimates a user's age from a 3D FaceScan and checks it against a defined threshold, such as confirming a user is over 18 or over 21, providing a proportionate answer for services that only need to confirm an age band.
Ties the age estimate to a genuine, live scan rather than a submitted photo, reducing the risk of a younger user using someone else's image to bypass the check.
Supports age verification flows that do not require full document collection, limiting the personal data a service needs to gather and retain purely to satisfy an age gate.
Derives an age estimate from the same liveness-checked scan technology.
Supports checks against different age bands depending on the service.
Prevents the age check being bypassed with a static photo of another person.
A platform offering age-restricted content needs to confirm a new user meets the applicable age threshold before granting access. Rather than requiring a full ID upload, the platform asks the user to complete a brief 3D FaceScan, which produces a liveness-checked age estimate. If the estimate clearly clears the required threshold, access is granted; if the result is borderline, the user can be routed to a fuller identity check instead, keeping data collection proportionate to the risk.
CyberLane helps organisations design age-verification flows that meet regulatory expectations while minimising unnecessary data collection, including how to handle borderline cases and where a fuller identity check should still be required.
CyberLane is independent and works on the decision rather than the deployment. Product-specific delivery is coordinated with the vendor or a qualified implementation partner.
FaceTec does not publish a conventional use-case catalogue. These applications have been compiled independently by CyberLane from FaceTec's official product pages, technical documentation and published case studies, and are written in CyberLane's own words rather than reproduced from vendor material.
We start with an independent conversation about where your exposure actually sits, before any technology decision is made.